CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2] — Page 93

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

In 10.35-20

In the Supreme Court of Hongkong

Original Jurisdiction

suit No. 33.

Plaintiff, Thomas Lehill Stayllar

Defendant - Ernest John Eitel

Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiff withdraws this suit on the following terms, having been consented to by the Defendant

viz

The Defendant admits that he made the statement to the Honorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson as repeated by the said Honorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson which is part set forth in the Plaintiff's Petition and now retracts the same and says the same is untrue.

The Defendant has apologised to the Plaintiff for having made the said statement to the said Honorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson.

Dated the 30th day of November 1881.

(a) Drereton & Wotton

Plaintiff's Solicitor

Le. A. A. Sangster

Acting Registrar of the

Supreme Court of Hongkong

Edit History

2026-05-22 22:49:14 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

In 10.35-20In the Supreme Court of HongkongOriginal Jurisdiction suit No. 33.Plaintiff, Thomas Lehill StayllarDefendant - Ernest John EitelNotice is hereby given that the Plaintiff withdraws this suit on the following terms, having been consented to by the DefendantvizThe Defendant admits that he made the statement to the Honorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson as repeated by the said Honorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson which is part set forth in the Plaintiff's Petition and now retracts the same and says the same is untrue.The Defendant has apologised to the Plaintiff for having made the said statement to the said Honorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson.Dated the 30th day of November 1881.(a) Drereton & WottonPlaintiff's SolicitorLe. A. A. SangsterActing Registrar of theSupreme Court of Hongkong

Baseline (Original)

In 10.35-20*In the Expreme Court of HongkongA67Original durisdictionDuit of 33.Plaintiff, Thomas lehild stayllarDefendant - Ernest John Eitel92Notice is heres, given that the daintiff withdraws this knit on the following terms. having been consented to by the Defendantvizthe Defendant admits that he made the statement to the Honorable Francie. Bulkeley Johnsonon as repeated by the said. Fonorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson whichPetition that is parth, let forth in the Plaintiffs and now retracts the same and says the same is untrue.The Defendant has apologised to the dlantiff for having made the said Bulkeley Johnson. to the said sonorable Francie.Dased the 30th day of November 1881.(a) Drereton & WottonPlaintiff's Folicitonle. a. A. Sangater Evoretching Registrar of theInpreme Count of stongdong

2026-05-22 22:49:14 · Baseline

View content

In 10.35-20

In the Expreme Court of Hongkong

Original durisdiction

Duit of 33.

Plaintiff, Thomas lehild stayllar

Defendant - Ernest John Eitel

Notice is heres, given that the daintiff withdraws this knit on the following terms. having been consented to by the Defendant

viz

the Defendant admits that he made the statement to the Honorable Francie. Bulkeley Johnson

on as repeated by the said. Fonorable Francis Bulkeley Johnson which Petition that

is parth, let forth in the Plaintiffs and now retracts the same and says the same is untrue.

The Defendant has apologised to the dlantiff for having made the said

Bulkeley Johnson.

to the said sonorable Francie.

Dased the 30th day of November 1881.

(a) Drereton & Wotton

Plaintiff's Foliciton

le. a. A. Sangater Evor

etching Registrar of the

Inpreme Count of stongdong

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.